The Last Days of Socrates: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo (Penguin Classics)

Product Information

D.R. Campbell argued that "Plato believes that the soul must be both the principle of motion and the subject of cognition because it moves things specifically by means of its thoughts." [28]

a b Roberts, Warren (1989). Jacques-Louis David: Revolutionary Artist. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. p.32. Is there any function of the soul that you could not accomplish with anything else, such as taking care of something ( epimeleisthai), ruling, and deliberating, and other such things? Could we correctly assign these things to anything besides the soul, and say that they are characteristic ( idia) of it? It is not at all clear how these two roles of the soul are related to each other. But we observe this casual oscillation nevertheless throughout the dialogue and indeed throughout the whole corpus. For instance, consider this passage from Republic I: Dorothea Frede argued that “as to the exact nature of the soul we are left somehow in the dark by Plato in the Phaedo and also in Republic X." [27]Campbell, Douglas 2021. "Self‐Motion and Cognition: Plato's Theory of the Soul." Southern Journal of Philosophy 59 (4): 523-544. urn:lcp:lastdaysofsocrat00plat:epub:48df612d-0ddd-4d35-a82e-0f9703940b22 Extramarc University of Toronto Foldoutcount 0 Identifier lastdaysofsocrat00plat Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t7cr6dr38 Isbn 9780140445824

Throughout the 20th century, scholars universally recognized this as a flaw in Plato's theory of the soul, with this trend continuing and then ultimately being rejected in the 21st century. [25]Campbell, Douglas (2021). "Self‐Motion and Cognition: Plato's Theory of the Soul." Southern Journal of Philosophy 59 (4): 523-544. In this rich appreciation of Plato’s philosophical achievement, Emerson emphasizes Plato’s work on the nature of the human soul, while at the same time offering Plato as the preeminent example of the philosophical mind. Nothing more Crito, than what I have always recommended, which is to take care of yourself, and thus you will do a service to me, my family and yourselves. Even though he was never able to prove his objective standards to his own – or others' – satisfaction, his attempt created a concept that had never been articulated before in such a highly developed form: that there is a higher good to strive for in life, an objective truth one should seek, and a right way of living one's life according to the standards of that truth.

urn:lcp:lastdaysofsocrat00plat_1:lcpdf:7ac3ac51-12f6-494b-b976-a5164f028a73 Extramarc University of Toronto Foldoutcount 0 Identifier lastdaysofsocrat00plat_1 Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t3710pd37 Invoice 11 Isbn 0140449280 Ocr tesseract 5.3.0-3-g9920 Ocr_detected_lang en Ocr_detected_lang_conf 1.0000 Ocr_detected_script Latin Ocr_detected_script_conf 0.9698 Ocr_module_version 0.0.21 Ocr_parameters -l eng Openlibrary OL3702864M Openlibrary_edition So I made myself spokesman for the oracle, and asked myself whether I would rather be as I was—neither wise with their wisdom nor ignorant with their ignorance—or possess both qualities as they did. I replied through myself to the oracle that it was best for me to be as I was.’ Solmsen, Friedrich. 1955. “Antecedents of Aristotle’s Psychology and the Scale of Beings.” American Journal of Philology 76: 148–64. Fletcher R., Platonizing Latin: Apuleius’s Phaedo in G. Williams and K. Volk, eds., Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy, Oxford University Press, 2015, p. 238–59

Now if we received this knowledge before our birth, and were born with it, we knew, both before and at the moment of our birth, not only the equal, and the greater, and the less, [regarding abstract equality] but also everything of the same kind, did we not? Our present reasoning does not refer only to equality. It refers just as much to absolute good, and absolute beauty, and absolute justice, and absolute holiness; in short, I repeat, to everything which we mark with the name of real, in the questions and answers of our dialectic. So we must have received our knowledge of all realities before we were born. (75c-d)

Plato went to Sicily in 367 BC to instruct the new ruler of Syracuse, Dionysius the Younger, in how to rule philosophically. The experiment, however, failed. Plato returned to Syracuse in 361 BC but again his entanglement in Sicilian affairs failed. The last years of his life were spent writing and lecturing at the Academy. He died at the age of 80 in Athens in either 348 or 347 BC. Sedley, David. 1995. "The Dramatis Personae of Plato's Phaedo." [In] Philosophical Dialogues: Plato, Hume, and Wittgenstein, 3–26 Edited by Timothy J. Smiley. Proceedings of the British Academy 85. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. The Phaedo presents a real challenge to commentators through the way that Plato oscillates between different conceptions of the soul. Trabattoni, Franco (2023). From Death to Life: Key Themes in Plato's Phaedo. Brill. ISBN 9789004538221.This play is about the conflict between King Henry VIII of England and Sir Thomas More, his lord chancellor, who was executed when he would not compromise on a matter of conscience. Frede, Dorothea. 1978. "The Final Proof of the Immortality of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedo 102a–107a". Phronesis, 23.1: 27–41. The Phaedo has come to be considered a seminal formulation, from which "a whole range of dualities, which have become deeply ingrained in Western philosophy, theology, and psychology over two millennia, received their classic formulation: soul and body, mind and matter, intellect and sense, reason and emotion, reality and appearance, unity and plurality, perfection and imperfection, immortal and mortal, permanence and change, eternal and temporal, divine and human, heaven and earth." [31] Texts and translations [ edit ] Original texts [ edit ] Plato's influence throughout the history of philosophy is so large that it is hard to measure. When he died, the philosopher, Speusippus (d. about 339 BC) became head of the Academy. The school stayed open until AD 529 when it was shut down by then Byzantine emperor Justinian I, who objected to what he thought were it's pagan teachings. See Campbell 2021: 524 n. 1 for more examples of scholars hurling this problem at Plato's feet, both in the English-language scholarship and abroad.