Don't Look Now and Other Stories (Penguin Modern Classics)

Product Information

Filming began in England in December 1972, breaking off for Christmas, and resuming in January 1973 for seven more weeks in Italy.

But a close reading of “Don’t Look Now” that focuses on the relationships between the main characters, combined with the understanding that du Maurier wrote this story late in her life, raises some interesting issues. On the way back to his hotel, John sees the frightened little girl in the cloak and hood again, this time with a man in pursuit. Her work was criticized as being mere romantic escapism, but this opinion never seemed to dim du Maurier’s efforts, considering she wrote until her last days. The rumours were seemingly confirmed in 2011 by former Variety editor Peter Bart, who was a Paramount executive at the time. The associative use of recurring motifs, combined with unorthodox editing techniques, foreshadows key events in the film.In 2012 Time Out also undertook a poll of the horror industry, in which more than 100 professionals who work within or have connections to the genre selected their favourite horror films, which saw Don't Look Now finish in twelfth position.

He follows the dwarf into a room and, thinking that he has rescued the frightened child of the day before, he bolts the door.Ugo Mariotti, a casting director on the film, spotted Donaggio on a Vaporetto on the Grand Canal in Venice, and believing it to be a "sign", contacted him to see if he would be interested in working on the film. The film's imagery and stylistic techniques have served as an inspiration to films such as Schindler's List directed by Steven Spielberg, [93] Memento by Christopher Nolan, [94] [95] [96] The Dark by John Fawcett, [97] Frozen by Juliet McKoen, [98] Submarine by Richard Ayoade, [99] and Snow White and the Huntsman by Rupert Sanders. Although he mocks the sisters’ explanation of his own psychic powers (imagining them visiting he and Laura in England and holding “a seance in the living-room, tambourines appearing out of thin air”), he leaves their hotel in a hurry once the blind one falls into her trance. The funeral scene at the end of the film was also played differently from what was originally intended.

At the very end of the story, however, John’s mix of irony and alcohol will prove By the time the story comes to its violent conclusion, John realizes too late that this is true and that the scream and the child/dwarf running the previous day were a warning vision. Don't Look Now—marketed as a "psychic thriller" [46]—was released in London's West End on 16 October 1973.Although real-life couple Natalie Wood and Robert Wagner were suggested for the parts of Laura and John Baxter, Roeg was eager to cast Julie Christie and Donald Sutherland from the very start. The mysterious red-coated figure and its association with death has a direct parallel with an earlier film Roeg worked on as cinematographer, The Masque of the Red Death, which depicted a red clad Grim Reaper character. Does it appear more often in some parts of the world, and are some people more susceptible to it than others?

In the meantime, the police have brought Heather in for questioning, and an apologetic John offers to escort her back to the hotel. Suddenly, John sees from the corner of his eye a small child, in a cloak with a hood covering her head, running away from someone. She is from Edinburgh, has a shock of white hair, and often stares toward John as though she sees him. Even though Kelly lauds “Don’t Look Now,” he allows that du Maurier “does not develop her characters to the point where we can have any strong feelings of sympathy for them. Danny Boyle cites Nicolas Roeg as a key influence on his work and counts it amongst his favourite films, [73] [74] considering it to be "one of the masterpieces of the last century".

Bart reiterated Warren Beatty's discontent, noting that Beatty had contacted him to complain about what he perceived to be Roeg's exploitation of Christie, and insisting that he be allowed to help edit the film. Having gone through the film shot by shot, he came to the conclusion it is a "masterpiece of physical filmmaking, in the way the photography evokes mood and the editing underlines it with uncertainty".