276°
Posted 20 hours ago

Doctor Who Revisitations 3 (The Tomb of the Cybermen/The Three Doctors/The Robots of Death) [DVD]

£7.495£14.99Clearance
ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
ZTS2023
Joined in 2023
82
63

About this deal

Stylianou-Georgiou, A., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2017). Answer changing in testing situations: The role of metacognition in deciding which answers to review. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(3–4), 102–118. Wang, C., Xu, G., & Shang, Z. (2018). A two-stage approach to differentiating normal and aberrant behavior in computer based testing. Psychometrika, 83(1), 223–254. The Master left UNIT a parting gift – something alien and deadly. The Wirrn have come to Earth, and now they are free… Olea, J., Revuelta, J., Ximénez, M. C., & Abad, F. J. (2000). Psychometric and psychological effects of review on computerized fixed and adaptive tests. Psicológica, 21(1–2), 157–173.

Vista, A., Care, E., & Awwal, N. (2017). Visualising and examining sequential actions as behavioural paths that can be interpreted as markers of complex behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 656–671. Wang, S., Fellouris, G., & Chang, H. H. (2017). Computerized adaptive testing that allows for response revision: Design and asymptotic theory. Statistica Sinica, 27(4), 1987–2010. Qiao, X., & Jiao, H. (2018). Data mining techniques in analyzing process data: A didactic. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2231. Geiger, M. A. (1991). Changing multiple−choice answers: Do students accurately perceive their performance? Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 250–257.But there is reason to mistrust this cry for help. The files show that UNIT has faced the Kalvyri before. What else they reveal will set Kate at odds with her most trusted friends. van der Linden, W. J., Jeon, M., & Ferrara, S. (2011). A paradox in the study of the benefits of test−item review. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48(4), 380–398.

In the years since the Stangmoor Prison incident, Captain Chin Lee found a new calling. She now heads up an international organisation, dedicated to meditation and ‘mental fortitude’ training. Milia, L. D. (2007). Benefiting from multiple−choice exams: The positive impact of answer switching. Educational Psychology, 27, 607–615. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953). Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, 1087–1092.

Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 64, 583–639. Lu, J., & Wang, C. (2020). A response time process model for not-reached and omitted items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57(4), 584–620.

Lu, J., Wang, C., & Shi, N. (2023a). A mixture response time process model for aberrant behaviors and item nonresponses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 58(1), 71–89. Chen, M.-H., Shao, Q.-M., & Ibrahim, J. G. (2000). Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian computation. Springer.Wise, S. L. (1994). Understanding self−adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(1), 15–24. Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D. (1992). The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 33–40.

Bezirhan U, von Davier M, & Grabovsky I. (2020). Multiple group hierarchical speed accuracy revisit model. In Paper presented at the 85th International Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Geiger, M. A. (1991). Changing multiple−choice answers: A validation and extension. College Student Journal, 25, 181–186. van der Linden, W. J. (2007). A hierarchical framework for modeling speed and accuracy on test items. Psychometrika, 72, 287–308. Tang, X., Wang, Z., Liu, J., & Ying, Z. (2020). An exploratory analysis of the latent structure of process data via action sequence autoencoders. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 74, 1–33. Kruger, J., Wirtz, D., & Miller, D. T. (2005). Counterfactual thinking and the first instinct fallacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 725–735.Al-Hamly, M., & Coombe, C. (2005). To change or not to change: Investigating the value of MCQ answer changing for Gulf Arab students. Language Testing, 22, 509–531. On a distant, barren planet, Storm Mine 4 trawls across bleak deserts and through fierce duststorms in search of rare and valuable metals. On board the Sandminer is a small skeleton crew, who alternate between indulgentrelaxation and skilled mining work. The mundane, day-to-day duties of the mine are attended to by a much larger complement of servile robots. This is a society that is dependant on robots for all areas of life, the people comforted by the knowledge that the strictest safeguards are built into each and every robot’s programming. So when one of the miner crew is murdered, suspicion falls on two new arrivals… The Doctor and Leela arrive on board, and are immediately accused of being the prime murder suspects. But The Doctor soon realises that perhaps the killer isn’t human. More deaths occur – can he persuade the remaining crewmembers that the killer may be a robot? After the world’s strangest interview, UNIT’s latest recruit, Shana Siddiqui, hits the ground running to help Osgood with her latest assignment. The Five Faces of Doctor Who The full trailer for the 1981 repeat season which included The Three Doctors. The Curse of the Cybermen’s Tomb’– Sir Christopher Frayling and Dr Debbie Challis examine the ancient Egyptian origins to the story.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment