CB-X CB-6000 Chastity Cage Clear

Product Information

It’s definitely not the cheapest chastity cage on the market but I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a bad review from someone who owns a genuine one. Cage: both cages are formed from two halves which are sonically welded together. Whilst this may be strong in most situations, the actual weld points are fairly small so any pressure exerted inside the cages is distributed over a smaller area where the joins are and has the potential to lead to the cage splitting. Both of the cages internal seams are really smooth and barely noticeable. The external seams where the spacer attaches are a little rough on both cages. I also noticed that where the opening is at the front of both cages, there is the possibility of a rough edge. This may need to be sanded ever so slightly. The CB6000S cage on the other hand seems to be more resistant to breakages given there is less opportunity for an erection so less force exerted on the cage. I have been wearing the shorted cage for much longer periods of time and no sign of seam failure yet.

With the possible exception of the Cherry Keeper chastity device I own, without a doubt, the Holy Trainer Nano V4 is the most comfortable chastity device I’ve ever worn. The device is feather-light in weight, but it feels solid and well made. It’s usually worth claiming ESA even if you get 1 of these benefits. You’ll get whichever amount is higher. If you get income-related ESA I believe the ring design is the biggest reason the device feels so comfortable. It is wider at the top and narrows toward the bottom. The ring is designed to be more compatible with men’s bodies and is wider and narrower at the right places, instead of being a perfect circle. The ergonomic design fit my scrotum perfectly.As the CB6000 and CB6000S devices don’t allow full cleaning due to their total encapsulation of the penis shaft and head, I find I need to have the cage removed every 3 or so days to clean it thoroughly. This also gives the penis time to “relax and air” and allows for a health inspection. Whilst extended wear is certainly possible, I found that after almost a week of wear without removal, the device tends to get really smelly and needs to be taken off for cleaning. I did find that after constantly wearing a CB6000, my penis was more accepting of the smaller cage and going to a CB6000S still felt comfortable. I haven’t worn a CB6000 cage in a while now and will probably not return to one to be honest. I will embellish on style and discuss visibility under clothing. Both devices can be worn comfortably day to day without really being noticed. The CB6000 has a slightly larger bulge in the pants but to date, I have had no-one make any comments about it. The CB6000S is even more discrete and definitely less noticeable. I wear lycra bathers daily as I find it supports the cage and restricts movement. I was wearing bathers daily long before I got into chastity as I enjoyed the sensation they give and chastity only enhances that. I try to wear at least one piece of lycra, leather or lace (LLL) at all time to remind me of my kinky side. I would honestly say if you are of average length, get the CB6000S as you will probably enjoy the sensation it provides. If you are more than gifted in the length department, maybe get the CB6000. The internal diameter of the Nano at 1.3 inches fit my penis flawlessly. The tube felt snug without being overly tight. The length at 1.41 inches was a little short for my average-sized penis and caused a slight turtling effect, but I found that comfortable and liked how the tip of my penis reached the end of the tube.

The amount of ESA you’ll get from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) depends on the type of ESA you claim.You might get: Not much to say here apart from the device being one that totally encapsulates the penis and fits around the base of the testes. The devices are visually pleasing and form a natural line with the body. The point here is that the Nano, like most devices, will retain some urine dribbles inside. That will necessitate proper and regular cleaning beyond the shower if you don’t want to walk around smelling of stale pee.

Resources and tools

Rings and spacers: both devices use the same rings and spacers but I have noticed that there seems to be some variation in the quality of the castings. Some parts have definite seams that you can feel and which could cause comfort problems. If concerned, a little sanding with some wet and dry sandpaper could solve the issues. At any time while you’re getting ESA, you might get extra amounts called 'premiums'. If you're in the support group I’m not the biggest fan of closed cages like the Holytrainer. Cleaning is a lot harder so you need to take it off for cleaning more often. You also can’t feel as much as more open cages which might be a bonus for some people, but in general I don’t like it.

The DWP might take money off your income-related ESA – it depends on the type of income you have. If you live with a partner, it also depends on your partner’s income. If you or your partner earns money from work Please remember that this review is based on my personal experiences only and any decision you make about wearing or buying a chastity device is entirely yours alone. If you buy a device based on what I have written and have problems, then you have my sympathies but remember that you chose to buy it. As always, read as much as you can about chastity devices, chastity play and safe use before you begin on this path.

Comments

Overall, both cages are easy to clean with the CB6000S being a little easier as it is smaller and a regular cotton bud can almost go through the entire device. The Nano is the first Holy Trainer chastity device I’ve tried, but you can find images of the earlier models on the web, from the V1 through the V3. In comparison to the previous models, the V4 appears more sleek and ergonomic. It is evident that with each new iteration, Holy Trainer continues to find ways to make slight improvements to their basic design. Hygiene is very important to me. If I were going to wear the Holy Trainer Nano for an extended period, I’d remove it at least every four or five days to do a proper cleaning. That’s why for extended periods of chastity, I prefer open cage-type chastity devices that allow me to keep clean using only my handheld shower head. Once adjusted, both devices fit very well. If you tend to be more generous in the length department then the Cb6000 could be a better fit. If you are a little less gifted, then the CB6000S may be better. Now being as I am bigger than average I started wearing a Cb6000 cage. This is very comfortable and less constricting. For me, the point of a chastity device is to minimize erections and discourage playing with myself. I decided to get a Cb6000S cage as it looked more restricting, and it certainly is. Wearing the CB6000 cage I can fill the tube right to the end which although is very satisfying, it also didn’t serve to discourage erections. Wearing the CB6000S on the other hand, my penis fills the tube at all times, and the tube serves to compress me and always be a constant reminder of what I am wearing. Whilst wearing the CB6000 you can really forget it is on, but with the CB6000S, you always know it is on.

It weighs less than a metal cage and is inconspicuous under clothing in public. It has length 2. At 5 inches, your slave will be very narrow and fit small penises or the most experienced slaves. These CB6000/s cages are great entry level devices to anyone wanting to start playing with chastity. Whilst they do cost a fair amount, the price is usually less than a custom metal cage device, and certainly less than full belts. Whilst many other competitors have arrived in the market offering similar devices made of poly-carbonate, silicon and other substances, the products from ALE tend to be more well known and have good support from the manufacturer. Like anything you buy, you have to be happy with the product and for the price, I am happy. My only word of caution is to be wary of counterfeit devices which seem to be flooding the market. They may appear to be the same and function the same, there is always the possibility of a problem with the construction or the quality and composition of the materials used.

About this site

About 3 months after you claim ESA the DWP will assess you. Depending on how much your condition affects you, they’ll put you in either the 'work-related activity group' or the 'support group'. Which group you're in affects how much ESA you get. The CB6000 cage seems more prevalent, at least in my case, to breakage. I put this down to the fact that given the length of the cage, the average penis can expand more and therefore exert more pressure on the whole cage. I have already broken two cages and have a spare one on hand if required. So how about some health-and-safety advice from an actual board-certified urologist instead? “I’ve never had a patient ask me about using, or admit to using, a male chastity device,” said Stephen H. King, MD, a urologist in Washington state. “And I cannot find a single reference in the medical/urological literature.” The ergonomic base ring is comfortable and sits well against my body. The device feels solid and secure despite the welcome light weight. I slept comfortably wearing the Nano from the first night. According to Holy Trainer, the tube is designed to discourage nighttime erections. It isn’t something I have a problem with anyway, but I didn’t awake with any nocturnal erections while wearing the device. I’ve found it easy to push the base ring away from my body a little and use my fingers to pull my soft peen out of the tube or cage with other devices. I attempted this with the Nano and was unable to do it. The chances of pulling out of this chastity device are slim unless you are determined to remove it.