Intel Core I9-12900K 3.20GHZ Chip

Product Information

Assassin's Creed: Valhalla has been a part of our system testing regimen for months (without issue), and this is a new phenomenon. Finally, to be clear, this isn't some old Podunk game we dug out of the bargain bin to see what would break 12th Generation Core just for fun... This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Finally, to close out our testing (we always leave the stress runs for last in case of disaster), our attempts to push the Intel Core i9-12900K to its thermal limits in a 10-minute run through Cinebench 23 in CoreTemp, we found the CPU posted a maximum temperature of 73 degrees C in our testing on a new Corsair iCue 360mm closed-loop liquid cooler. S" indicates a rare special or limited edition CPU, while "H" and "HK" both denote high-powered variants of Intel's laptop CPUs. Intel's Core i9s for laptops only come in H variants; you can see much lower powered Core i7 CPUs in the U-Series, meant for thin and light laptops. (More on that later.)

The culprit? All that P-core/E-core stuff we mentioned up above. During the course of our testing—which includes two runs of the popular title Assassin's Creed: Valhalla, one in 1080p and the other in 4K—we found the game would either crash halfway through the test run, or simply not boot in at all. We tried to test as many titles as we could ahead of this review, but time was already a factor with the benchmarking suite we had, let alone following behind Intel's late-stage answer about DRM compatibility with a trail of games that may or may not launch on the first go.Whether you're upgrading an aging desktop PC or just want to stay on the cutting edge of what's out there in laptops, Intel's lineup of Core i7 and Core i9 processors is loaded with powerful workhorse options. Most can handle almost any task you throw their way in a snap.But Intel offers lots of them, and they mostly sound the same.

Intel even provided several custom "workflow" benchmarks to its reviewer pool this time, designed to simulate those scenarios where the impact of its hybrid-architecture approach (and Thread Director's effect) would be most apparent. The PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X both use eight-core AMD processors, which may prompt game developers to take advantage of more cores. However, the preceding PS4 and Xbox One also use eight-core processors, and it's been seven years since their release without any sign that developers are creating their games to push CPUs past a comfortable four-core max utilization. New Intel Core X-Series Processors: Scale, Accessibility and Performance Go Extreme". Intel. May 30, 2017 . Retrieved June 2, 2017. The idea is that with Windows 11, it all works. With Windows 10, it almost all works. The main difference Intel told us is although Windows 10 can separate cores apart, and hyperthreads, it doesn’t really understand efficiency that well. So its decisions are made more in regards to performance requirements, rather than performance vs efficiency. At the end of the day, all this should mean to the user is that Windows 10 tries to minimizes the run-to-run variation, but Windows 11 does it better. Ultimate best-case performance shouldn’t change in any serious way: a single thread on a P-core, or across several P-cores for example, should perform the same. Let’s Talk TestingAll of this is necessary, because as you'll see in our benchmarking results below, Windows 10 can be worse at scheduling a 12th Gen desktop CPU than Windows 11 is. This is mostly due to Windows 10 not knowing what it's looking at when it sees an E-core, thinking that it's just a low-performance core that doesn't have the same power spectrum on tap as the P-cores. As such, it can schedule the E-cores "incorrectly," as it were (though that's an over-simplification), due to its limited information. Meanwhile, the added info being sent from Thread Director to the Windows 11 scheduler is all incorporated into the mix, which should, again in theory, add up to increased performance in that specific OS. All models support: SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), Intel VT-x, Intel VT-d, Hyper-threading, Turbo Boost 3.0, Thermal Velocity Boost, AES-NI, Smart Cache, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA 3.0