Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
En conjunto sale un librito con un montón de información entretenida, que da pistas y enlaces a muchísima más información y que nos da un paseo bastante amplio por varios barrios de las mates. Me ha encantado.
Por último, el capítulo 9, vivir felices para siempre, habla de umbrales de negatividad y cómo los estudios muestran que las parejas que callan y callan hasta que explotan duran menos en media que las que protestan mucho antes cuando algo no les gusta.
WORKSHEETS
In The Mathematics of Love, Dr. Hannah Fry takes the reader on a fascinating journey through the patterns that define our love lives, applying mathematical formulas to the most common yet complex questions pertaining to love: What’s the chance of finding love? What’s the probability that it will last? How do online dating algorithms work, exactly? Can game theory help us decide who to approach in a bar? At what point in your dating life should you settle down? The equations for the husband follow the same pattern: h, r HH t, and I HM are his mood when he’s on his own, his mood when he’s with his wife, and the influence his wife has on his next reaction, respectively. Boyz! Someday I topped the mountain of fascination to mathematics by the tender age that wonder can work. By now the mountain appeared up in the sky so large that I'm on the landing point. Not for the love of mathematics but for the love it can be a short guide to geeks—a lifelong planning course though; what demands more elaborations for sure!
As any mathematically minded person will tell you, it’s a fine balance between having the patience to wait for the right person and the foresight to cash in before all the good ones are taken. It included verbal abuse. Emotional abuse. Physical abuse. Sexual abuse. It had romantic encounters so thoroughly portrayed that I blushed as I tried to skim past them. Complete smut. Indeed, some such mathematically minded people have applied an area of mathematics known as “optimal stopping theory” to derive an actual equation that tells you precisely how many potential mates to reject before finding the perfect partner and helps you discern when it’s time to actually stop your looking and settle down with that person (P):
In this version of the graph, the dotted line indicates that the husband is having a positive impact on his wife. If it dips below zero, the wife is more likely to be negative in her next turn in the conversation.
Psycho-physiology is an important part of this research. It's something that Bob Levenson brought to the search initially, and then I got trained in psycho-physiology as well. And the reason we're interested in what was happening in the body is that there's an intimate connection between what's happening to the autonomic nervous system and what happening in the brain, and how well people can take in information — how well they can just process information — for example, just being able to listen to your partner — that is much harder when your heart rate is above the intrinsic rate of the heart, which is around a hundred to a hundred and five beats a minute for most people with a healthy heart. It sounds as if we have a stake in relationships staying together — but we don't. My major stake is in understanding. We have a stake in people not staying together if they don't feel good about their relationship and it's not really going anywhere for them, it's not really helping them build one another's dreams, it's not a relationship that has dignity. But we like to help people understand why it is that it didn't work, so that the next relationship, or next set of relationships, can be better. One of the major things we found is that honoring your partner's dreams is absolutely critical. A lot of times people have incompatible dreams — or they don't want to honor their partner's dreams, or they don't want to yield power, they don't want to share power. So that explains a lot of times why they don't really belong together. It’s been a remarkably long time since I sat down and even have begun to think of why or how I would review a book, but here I am. It’s good that I am for this one, too, because this work of Hannah Fry’s is awesome. (I could stop here, but I won’t, as I’ll have to give some evidence as to why this work is awesome. Also, yes, I’m using the word awesome deliberately. I promise.)En el capítulo 3, cómo maximizar una salida nocturna, se nos habla de equilibrios de Nash y los óptimos de Pareto, del algoritmo de Galey-Shapley y de cómo, a pesar de que puede parecer lo contrario, el sexo que inicia cortejo acaba mejor, en media, que el que lo acepta o rechaza. Mathematician Fry explores the age-old questions about relationships by examining patterns behind love and lust in this smart, funny read' Marie Claire this wonderfully perceptive, nostalgic tale... is an enthralling and beautifully written romance.” - Psychologies
Two barrels accounted for two rabbits and I sent the dogs to retrieve them. Following at my leisure, I was surprised to see them swerve away from their task towards the hedge. Then Titus raised his head and set to barking.
What this love algorithm is suggesting is that whoever does the asking (and is willing to face rejection until receiving the best available option) is better off. Meanwhile, the person who waits for advances settles for their last option. Let’s take a look at this algorithm in action below. function stableMatching {
Great Deal 
New Comment