Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
No single theory has consistently dominated naturalistic views on Book of Mormon composition. [10] In the twenty-first century, leading naturalistic interpretations of Book of Mormon origins hold that Smith authored it himself, whether consciously or subconsciously, and simultaneously sincerely believed the Book of Mormon was an authentic sacred history. [63]
Image from the U.S. Library of Congress Rare Book and Special Collections Division) Presentation [ edit ]
whose name has not been written before the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who was slain” (ESV); or, The plot is probably the weakest part of this movie as it really doesn't make much sense or have any real weight to it. These two ghostly spirits make this wager on the young children but I'm not really sure why they do this, or why they even care what these kids get up to in the future. Its also an odd bet because they will both have to wait many many years to see the outcome, and what happens if neither of them marry this girl? surely they could make another simpler wager. Independent scholar William L. Davis posits that after believing he had encountered an angel in 1823, Smith "carefully developed his ideas about the narratives" of the Book of Mormon for several years by making outlines, whether mental or on private notes, until he began dictating in 1828. [70] Smith's oral recitations about Nephites to his family could have been an opportunity to work out ideas and practice oratory, and he received some formal education as a lay Methodist exhorter. [71] In this interpretation, Smith believed the dictation he produced reflected an ancient history, but he assembled the narrative in his own words. [72] Inspirations [ edit ]
The Book of Mormon depicts revelation as an active and sometimes laborious experience. For example, the Book of Mormon's Brother of Jared learns to act not merely as a petitioner with questions but moreover as an interlocutor with "a specific proposal" for God to consider as part of a guided process of miraculous assistance. [129] Also in the Book of Mormon, Enos describes his revelatory experience as a "wrestle which I had before God" that spanned hours of intense prayer. [130] [131] Apocalyptic reversal and indigenous or nonwhite liberation [ edit ] whose name has not been written in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain from the foundation of the world.” This first is Michael, the merciful and long-suffering: and the second, who is set over all the diseases and all the wounds of the children of men, is Raphael: and the third, who is set over all the powers, is Gabriel: and the fourth, who is set over the repentance unto hope of those who inherit eternal life, is named Phanuel. (1 Enoch 40:9) Interpretations [ edit ] Although some earlier unpublished studies had been prepared, not until the early 1970s was true textual criticism applied to the Book of Mormon. At that time BYU Professor Ellis Rasmussen and his associates were asked by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) to begin preparation for a new edition of its scriptures. One aspect of that effort entailed digitizing the text and preparing appropriate footnotes; another aspect required establishing the most dependable text. To that latter end, Stanley R. Larson (a Rasmussen graduate student) set about applying modern text critical standards to the manuscripts and early editions of the Book of Mormon as his thesis project—which he completed in 1974. Larson carefully examined the original manuscript (the one dictated by Joseph Smith to his scribes) and the printer's manuscript (the copy Oliver Cowdery prepared for the printer in 1829–1830), and compared them with the first, second, and third editions of the Book of Mormon; this was done to determine what sort of changes had occurred over time and to make judgments as to which readings were the most original. [267] Larson proceeded to publish a set of well-argued articles on the phenomena which he had discovered. [268] Many of his observations were included as improvements in the church's 1981 edition of the Book of Mormon.Axx°N N. wrote:NGE didn't have real-world physics, but its own physics where the workings of everything could be reasoned out, and even the psychodrama of Instrumentality had set-up and build-up that it worked as a payoff to. We knew enough of where Kaworu came from to connect dots, and yet we were left with an ambiguous and inscrutable personality whose significance required thought (or discussion) to fully tease out. But with NTE Kaworu there's mystery just because of withholding of information, and no elaboration on why things work the way they do, but no real mystery as to what he thinks and feels at all. Like Mari, he's mysterious where it doesn't matter and obvious where it counts. Most adherents of the Latter Day Saint movement consider the Book of Mormon an authentic historical record, translated by Smith from actual ancient plates through divine revelation. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), the largest Latter Day Saint denomination, maintains this as its official position. [64] Methods [ edit ] Damn this is so Mexican I half expected Robert Rodriguez to be the director. Indeed it is also no surprise to find out Guillermo del Toro was a producer on this movie although the entire project has that nice death obsessed Tim Burton-esque vibe to it much like 'Corpse Bride', you could almost say this was a Mexican version of a Tim Burton project. In other words, one does not have his/her name inscribed at some point in human history or as a result of anything he/she may do or believe. Belief in Jesus is the fruit of having one’s name inscribed in the book of life, not its cause. Distinctively, the Book of Mormon's portrayal democratizes revelation by extending it beyond the "Old Testament paradigms" of prophetic authority. In the Book of Mormon, dialogic revelation from God is not the purview of prophets alone but is instead the right of every person. Figures such as Nephi and Ammon receive visions and revelatory direction prior to or without ever becoming prophets, and Laman and Lemuel are rebuked for hesitating to pray for revelation. [124] In the Book of Mormon, God and the divine are directly knowable through revelation and spiritual experience. [125]
Related:
Great Deal 
New Comment