Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Following the saga of testing the wireless routers in a better way than just relying on the single-client tests (which are the easy way out for most publications), I decided to put a second TP-Link router (the Archer AX5400) through the hurdles of the multi-client stress test. And yes, the principle is the same as it was with the TP-Link AX3200, the ASUS GT-AX6000 and the TUF-AX5400– we connect five client devices to a server computer and then simulate various types of traffic (at the moment, I have simulated 4K and 1080p streaming, web browsing and VoIP). Mediatek is used as well just another chip. Often qualcomm isnt since they ask a lot for their stuff whilst not reallt offering a benefit and making products needlessly expensive. BTW, WiFi 6/6E were just incremental upgrades over WiFi 5 wave 2 (wave 2 implemented MU-MIMO technology, IIRC). WiFi 7 is a much larger step with MLO, potential for real-world +1Gbps WLAN speeds, and 320MHz channel width support. We can see from the graph that two client devices remained under this limit pretty much for the entire duration of the test, but three clients, the WiFi 6 Lenovo Y520 laptops and the WiFi 6E PC did experience a latency spike (the latter did not surprise me). With the exception of one of the two Lenovo laptops, it shouldn’t have a noticeable impact on the streaming experience. And even in the Lenovo laptop case, it does seem to experience it only for 1% of the time. TP-Link AX5400 AX73 – Multi-client stress test using 5 client devices – 1080p streaming (5GHz, 80MHz). The target throughput is 5Mbps.
HomeCare includes a more advanced QoS with optimization by application as well as the standard devices QoS. This can help make sure the games or services you care about the most are first in line for connections no matter the devices you use them on. If you have an online gamer in the house, this feature can keep their pings consistent. The circle on the heat map represents the location of the router, and the colors represent signal strength, with dark green being the strongest signal and lighter yellow being the weaker signal. Gray areas indicate no measurable signal reception. As shown on the 2.4GHz map above, the AX50 delivered a strong 2.4GHz signal throughout most of our test home, but the signal became slightly weaker in the far corners of the house and garage. The router’s 5GHz radio delivered better range, in which the signal remained relatively strong throughout the entire house. The Best Wi-Fi 6 Router for the Price Mumimo is something it has basically boils down to multiple antenna's can be used to focus on a device thats it. It’s also worth mentioning that I tried to keep the same distance between the client devices and the server (same as when testing the other wireless routers), but since distance means little, I decided to share the attenuation that was detected at the client level. The ZimaBoard 832 is positioned the farthest since it’s connected to a TV (it works as an alternative to the built-in computer) and the signal strength is -65dB, while the other four clients sit in the same room as the TP-Link AX5400 – the attenuation was -33dB for the WiFi 6E PC and it ranged between -38 and -43dB for the other three client devices. 4K and 1080p Streaming – 5 Client Devices Now let’s see if the 25Mbps limit was reached by all client devices and the performance is what you would expect. The WiFi 6E PC was well below it, while the WiFi 6 clients hovered at around 22Mbps – not great. 1080p Streaming and Browsing (+ VoIP) – 5 Client Devices
What's An "Indie Game", Anyway?
I see people referring to 2.4GHz and 5GHz as “2 different networks”. This is incorrect unless, for some specific reason, you either have VLANs linked to certain bands or you’re running a very advanced WLAN setup. Considering that I have around 50 wireless devices connected to the router, all hungry for attention, it’s quite an amazing feat for the price . We can also thank OFDMA too for this, as it enables simultaneous clients to transfer data at the same time within a single channel. TP-Link Archer AX55 Review – I haven’t used a TP-Link router for many years so it’s great to actually be able to test and review one of their newest wireless routers, the Archer AX55. TP-Link AX55 is an AX3000 Dual Band Gigabit Wi-Fi 6 router with 2,402Mbps on the 5GHz channel and 574Mbps on the 2.4GHz. Note: For those that are interested in the maximum theoretical data transfer rate (which doesn’t really show the real-life performance of a router), know that the TP-Link Archer AX50 is an AX3000-class WiFi 6 router and the max data transfer rate on the 2.4GHz band is 574Mbps, while on the 5GHz band, it’s 2,402Mbps. Features and Performance As for the processor. Its a router it literally can run whatever these all have a set end of life date no matter the chip in em sadly
You can manage the AX50 with the TP-Link Tether mobile app for Android and iOS devices, or you can use the web console. Both are easy to use, but the web console offers a few more advanced options such as DHCP Server, NAT Forwarding, Firewall, and IPv6 settings.The Tether app opens to a My Devices screen, which displays all installed TP-Link devices. Tap the AX73 router panel to open a Home screen with a network map, a list of connected devices on the wireless and guest networks, and buttons for Home, Clients, HomeShield, and Tools. Note: The TP-Link AX73 is advertised as an AX5400-class WiFi 6 router, so it features a maximum theoretical data transfer rate of 4,804Mbps on the 5GHz radio band and a maximum theoretical data transfer rate of 574Mbps on the 2.4GHz band – these are theoretical values, so you won’t be able to reach this performance inside your home (they can hardly be achieved in a lab). The WiFi Features Apart from that, we’ve had tons of Zoom meetings and didn’t experience any instability or disconnections. As it’s not intended to be a device providing whole-home coverage, this is fine. For greater coverage, you would want to consider investing in a
AX3000 speeds break down to 574Mbps at 2.4GHz and 2,402Mbps at 5GHz. Both of these routers can deliver plenty of speed for most people, but the extra headroom that comes with AX3000 will be good for those that want to do more local networking. The software side is more ambitious. The AX53 runs TP-Link’s standard router firmware, with largely the same set of features as the company’s flagship models. This means you get not just port forwarding and QoS controls but also some surprisingly advanced options, such as IPv6 and ALG configuration. Those wanting to really take control of their network can configure up to four VLANs and set up static routing. On most wireless routers, the WLAN and LAN are bridged by default. So a client’s connection to either band takes them to the same network. With OneMesh network, you can extend your wireless network coverage with ease. We live in a two-storey house and there are spots where things can get a bit flaky occasionally.I know that a lot will say that these tests are not purely objective and yes, the results will differ depending on the amount of interference, the location and the type of client devices. Surely, there are better multi-client tests out there, such as the octoPal, but that will have an impact on the wallet and not many professionals bother with non-enterprise wireless networking devices since the cost is just too high. So yeah, netburn and net-hydra are the best we got for now. I’ve somewhat been having troubles occasionally with D-Link’s Wi-Fi 6 routers and Mesh routers ( DIR-X1560 and COVR X-1873) where sometimes my PC/laptops/smartphones get connected to the 2.4GHz instead of 5GHz and giving us a slower network speed. Actually, if you’re coming from a WiFi 4 generation router, you’d see much more improvement in upgrading to WiFi 5 or better. Unless you live on a farm in the rural countryside where you don’t have to worry about your neighbours’ WiFi interference. We found TP-Link's mobile interface was simple enough, but it does require deeper navigation to access more options that would have been nice to access on a dashboard or higher level. In general, mobile friendliness was a tad below the average for the entire test group. This also means you can no longer have 2 sperate networks if you wish that on 2.4ghz and 5ghz unless the router allows that modification.
Related:
Great Deal 
New Comment