Don't Sleep, There are Snakes: Life and Language in the Amazonian Jungle

Product Information

They don't have a counting system, they don't have creation myths since they aren't interested in stories of things that happened more than two eyewitnesses removed from themselves, they maintain only a bare minimum of physical possessions and they seem to eschew the idea of accumulating even items such as tools and food they'll inevitably need to use later. Chomsky seems to posit that the inclusion of recursion is a must-have for a language and something that separates human languages from other forms of communication. For example, Everett discusses general theories of language long after describing his conclusions about the specific characteristics of the Pirahas' language.

But the bulk of the text is devoted to really trying to understand their culture, which he does through the “immediacy of experience” principle. Everett comes to respect this world view so much that he begins to analyze exactly why he felt he needed Christianity in the first place, and he eventually reaches the conclusion that any kind of subjective belief system that makes judgmental and far-reaching claims about the universe without any evidence to back it up is unnecessary and often harmful. His writing style is refreshingly free from jargon and academic buzz words, and his explanatory style is clear and easy to follow. The Pirahas have deep feelings, but to survive, they know life is hard and they strive to resolve our own problems. Though he faces a bunch of hurdles, he is eventually able to learn the language and live among the people.Some very amusing anecdotes combined with some illuminating observations about the role of culture in shaping language, contrary to the prevailing paradigm of linguistics. Someone like me, who has a Western worldview, finds it hard to imagine living life without say, counting and numbers. To speak the language well he must understand the culture and context for the Piraha, and there is no reason they would eat a salad. The Pirahã have managed, through sheer force of being content with their own lives, to reject Western culture and capitalism.

This book is about the lessons I have learned over three decades of studying and living with the Pirahas, a time in which I have tried my best to comprehend how they see, understand, and talk about the world and to transmit these lessons to my scientific colleagues.Much like Norm in Cheers goes on about Cheez-doodles and the Hungry Heifer, his own version of culinary favorites. Often when I first opened my eyes, groggily coming out of a dream, a Piraha child or sometimes even an adult would be staring at me from between the paxiuba palm slats that served as siding for my large hut. example, embedding it in ‘Mary thinks that…'), and there is no non-arbitrary upper bound to sentence length.

Then, his stepmother committed suicide, he saw the light, accepted Jesus, and his life became better. But frequently they use an expression that, though surprising at first, has come to be one of my favorite ways of saying good night: “Don’t sleep, there are snakes. His perplexing objective was “to convince happy, satisfied people that they are lost and need Jesus as their personal savior. The key point of which was that during the six months of summer a grizzly has to take in 40,000 calories a day to build up the energy reserve that will feed it for six months of hibernation.Xipoogi and Xahoabisi thought the clean, nice-smelling, and colorfully dressed Brazilian women were gorgeous. As someone who thinks about my past and future constantly, I found this extremely captivating and envious because I wish I could be that carefree. Everett's malaria-stricken wife, a member of the tribe giving birth alone on the riverbank, or a woman effectively gang-raped by the males of the tribe. After many years, Elliot finds that the Pirahas and their culture change him, not the other way round, as he reassesses his attitudes to language, religion, life and death.

Their way of life was the same as it was 1,000 years ago, and would remain the same for the next 1,000 years. While it is generally agreed that culture affects certain aspects of language, most notably vocabulary, effects on grammar have largely been dismissed. Everett's limitations with regard to religion made him unable to understand that the Piraha really did have a religion. Similarly, with respect to the Eskimo words for snow thing, it’s been pointed out that English actually has rather a lot of words for snow too, and that certain Eskimo languages use compound word forms which means phrases that in English would use multiple words (heavy snow) in Eskimo get agglomerated into one (heavysnow). By the late ‘80s, after ten years of failed efforts, Everett realized that he had become a closet atheist.And yet as certain as I was about this, the Pirahãs were equally certain that there was something there. Ah well I did wonder how Everett’s (and Chomsky’s) views were regarded in the linguist community, nicole – and was aware that in the book, the lay reader has only Everett’s word to go on. Most of the study seems to have been conducted on male pirahã even though he alludes to the fact women speak differently. If he is sincere in his desire to preserve this indigenous culture, is he wise to uproot two of its members and expose them to this foreign city, just so that he can continue to study their language? I would go so far as to suggest that the Pirahãs are happier, fitter, and better adjusted to their environment than any Christian or other religious person I have ever known.