NIKE J Guard-Ce Soccer Shin Guards

Product Information

However, the fact that there was no significant difference between the Carbon-1 (EVA) and Carbon-2 (neoprene) models during the LIF trials does not imply that this effectiveness would continue during HIF trials. sensors per cm 2 covering the whole surface under the shin guard, whereas Ankrah and Mills, 2003 placed only seven sensors of 9.

In the LIF trials the Nike Mercurial™ model was superior over the Adidas Predator™ and the Adidas UCL™ models, whereas in the HIF trials all three models behaved similarly. Bought these for my grandson who plays in a team every week,he loves that he is able to just slip them inside his footy socks without the need of the elastic,would highly recommend.This includes products that have been personalized with printing either on the back or front (including sleeve patches). Athletes try to compensate for this shortcoming by inserting various soft materials between the shin guard and the tibia, but this increases the weight.

Made of high-strength polyethylene, inside light EVA foam, which has an excellent shock-absorbing property. Unexpected actions such as kicks or slide tackles are the main reasons of these injuries (Barrey et al.During HIF trials, the maximum force values measured by the sensors attached to the front of the tibia under the shin guard were 143. Ten hand-colored lithograph plates and hand colored lithograph illustrations on the front and rear boards. Carbon shin guards with EVA and neoprene liners gave comparable results for the maximum force and the impulse values at low-level impacts. The impact mechanism of the experimental set up was designed to hit the shin guard by the heel of the foot (an area of approximately 20 cm 2). You can choose between black or white guards depending on preference - both come in unisex designs catering for all, giving you control of your game.

When comparing for mean force, peak force and impulse, both carbon fiber shin guards performed better than the commercial ones (Adidas Predator™, Adidas UCL™, and Nike Mercurial™) (p = 0. The Mitre Aircell Power Shin Guards is a pro-level guard with Aircell technology that’s totally breathable, keeping legs cooler and drier over 90 minutes.

During LIF trials, the maximum force measured by the sensors attached in front of the tibia under the shin guard was 26.

In some cases these cookies improve the speed with which we can process your request, allow us to remember site preferences you’ve selected. During high-energy impact trials, these three shin guards responded similarly even though there were differences in the thickness of the liner. Based on these same parameters, the Nike Mercurial™ provided better protection than the Adidas Predator™ and the Adidas UCL™ (p = 0. among the Adidas Predator™ and the Adidas UCL™ and the Nike Mercurial™, However, significant differences were observed between the impulse values of the Adidas Predator™ and the other shin guards (p < 0.

The Nike Mercurial™ and the Adidas Predator™ models have an identical total thickness of 10 mm, but the outer shell of Nike Mercurial™ is 1 mm thicker. The minimum and the maximum values measured by Load Cell-1 in the trials were not included in the statistical analysis. For peak force and impulse, the carbon fiber shin guards provided better protection than all the others.