Letters to a Law Student: A guide to studying law at university

Product Information

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Finally, although the Stanleys’ reluctance to sell their assets might be relevant in determining whether bankruptcy is a good option for them, it is not relevant to the application of the rule. We want you to distill the relevant legal rule from the reading and be prepared to apply it to new facts. Many studies and surveys have shown a minimum of 40% and others have shown that up to 75% of all high school graduates are not prepared for college or work.

I would recommend it as a good starting point for understanding the evolving nature of English Common Law and its most significant moments. Letters to a Law Student relays all that a prospective law student needs to know before embarking on their studies. Voted in the top 6 books that future law students should read, it is an approachable and easy-to-follow guidebook.Looking at the evolution of the Rule of Law and its modern application, I would highly suggest reading this book to anyone who wants to clearly understand the principles on which our Law is based. The book will help you do better in law school as it teaches various skills required to succeed in law school.

If a court finds that the “value” of the Stanleys’ assets exceeds their debts, the Stanleys can’t file bankruptcy. Judges decide concrete cases, telling the parties to that case what the law says in that particular case. I would strongly recommend this book to current students, as it raises issues which are not dealt with in other texts and has many sterling qualities.Although we, your teachers, will be pressing you to your limit, we also hope that you become healthy, well-rounded, fully functioning professionals. Your professors, and ultimately, the judges before whom you argue, will be most inclined to make the necessary leaps of faith if they see an argument that leads, like stepping stones, through the historical precedents to the next logical step. Sometimes, we get into discussions about the applicability of the rule that squarely involve these kinds of social and moral issues. In other words, you should choose the option that you feel most confident about and the one you feel like you’ll succeed with.

The legal argument with which to object to an arguably wrong result is not that it was not fair, but that it did not follow the applicable rules correctly.

The facts of this case suggest that the Stanleys have satisfied the rule and are entitled to file bankruptcy. Many modern teachers have fallen away from the rigid, Kingsfieldian[8] approach to the Socratic method, on the grounds that learning cannot take place in an atmosphere of abject fear. Lawyers do this, but they also have another job, and that is convincing the decision maker that the facts of this case fit the rule.