Prime Hydration Drink

Product Information

Date: 24th September 2019 Neutral Citation: [2019] UKSC 41 Court: Supreme Court Link: Link to Judgment a b O'Carroll, Lisa (29 August 2019). "Boris Johnson faces third legal battle over prorogation". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 11 December 2019 . Retrieved 24 September 2019.

After the ruling, Johnson was criticised by opposition leaders: Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn brought forward his conference keynote speech and invited Johnson to "consider his position and become the shortest-serving Prime Minister there's ever been"; SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon demanded Johnson's resignation and urged Parliament to table a motion of no confidence if he did not resign; Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson said that Johnson was not "fit to be Prime Minister"; and Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage called prorogation "the worst political decision ever" and called on Johnson to fire his adviser Dominic Cummings for suggesting the plan. [45] a b "Brexit: Scottish judges rule Parliament suspension is unlawful". BBC News. 11 September 2019. Archived from the original on 26 May 2020 . Retrieved 24 September 2019. Is the question of whether the Prime Minister’s advice to the Queen was lawful justiciable in a court of law?To resolve the fundamental differences between the senior courts of England and Wales and Scotland, both the Miller and Cherry cases were appealed to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom; the former skipped the Court of Appeal as a " leapfrog appeal". [26] [c] The Supreme Court began a three-day emergency hearing to consider the appeals on 17 September 2019. Due to the significance of the case, the maximum eleven of the twelve Supreme Court justices sat to hear the appeal, [28] with Lord Briggs not sitting to ensure an odd number of judges. The case was only the second case heard by eleven justices in the Supreme Court's history; the first was R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (2017), which delivered an 8–3 verdict that the royal prerogative could not be used to invoke Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. The court allowed six interveners to make representations over the course of the hearing: Raymond McCord, whose case was not heard alongside Miller and Cherry; the Lord Advocate for Scotland, James Wolffe; the Counsel General for Wales, Jeremy Miles; former Prime Minister John Major; the Shadow Attorney General, Shami Chakrabarti; and The Public Law Project. [29]

Supreme Court: Ex-PM's lawyer argues against prorogation". BBC News. 19 September 2019. Archived from the original on 23 January 2020 . Retrieved 24 September 2019. It turns out the founders of this viral sensation — the infamous dead-again-born-again Phoenix of YouTube Logan Paul, and controversial at times rapper-slash-boxer-slash-influencer KSI — knew something about marketing that even seasoned MBAs from Wharton forget: scarcity drives demand. And in this case, scarcity drives a brand to be a household name.

In the case of Prime Hydration, we see word of mouth (or digital word of mouth) resonate with more speed than COVID at a super-spreader event. Don’t believe me? Here’s the at-home rapid test:

Further speculation that Parliament could be prorogued led opposition MPs to successfully amend the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Bill to make prorogation during late October functionally impossible by requiring the government to report to Parliament its efforts to restore the Northern Ireland Assembly, which Parliament would then sit—even during prorogation—to debate. [9] In late July, the newly appointed Leader of the House of Commons, Jacob Rees-Mogg, said the government viewed prorogation for political purposes as an "archaic mechanism" which would not be used. [10] Despite this, Johnson still planned to have Parliament prorogued, and sought legal advice in mid-August from his Attorney General, Geoffrey Cox, to that effect. [11] Sweeney, Christopher (12 November 1975). "Australia in turmoil as Whitlam is fired". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 1 May 2020 . Retrieved 24 September 2019.In light of the third issue, it was ruled that this was not a normal prorogation in the run-up to a Queen’s Speech; it prevented Parliament from carrying out its constitutional role between the end of the summer recess and the Brexit deadline on 31st October. While prorogued, it was stated, neither House could meet or pass legislation, or debate Government policy. The exceptional circumstances of the prorogation were also considered, in that it took place during a time of fundamental change to the UK constitution with the 31 st October exit day. It was ruled that Parliament had a right to a voice in how that change comes about. No justification for taking the action of prorogation in this instance was given before the Court. In light of this, the Court concluded that the decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification. Overhear: The product is bought NOT through paid media channels like IG (post an ad, watch it run) but rather through some means of hearing about the product, either virally or digitally. Kids who bought Prime Hydration heard about it on social channels, saw their friends drink it at school – or even watched a Logan Paul influencer-laden video. “I must have this product that I’ve heard so much about, and it verily must be the bee’s knees” (how I imagine a 12-year-old thinks). Which leads to: Jacob Rees-Mogg, Leader of the House of Commons (25 July 2019). "Business of the House". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Vol.663. Parliament of the United Kingdom: House of Commons. col.1441.