Dr. Wolff´s Vagisan Moisturising Cream | Hormone Free Vaginal Moisturiser for Vaginal Dryness | Intimate Cream for Daily Vaginal Health | 2X 50g

Product Information

Aqua, Benzyl Alcohol, Cetearyl Alcohol, Cetyl Palmitate, Lactic Acid, Octyldodecanol, Polysorbate 60, Sodium Lactate, Sorbitan Stearate. It’s completely normal for your vagina to have a slight odour and that can change depending on where you are in your menstrual cycle, whether you’ve just had sex, or if you’ve been sweating a lot. “We all have a smell but it shouldn’t be unpleasant,” says Dr Morton. A common cause of abnormal vaginal odour is bacterial vaginosis, which can occur due to a change in the natural balance of bacteria in your vagina. Other causes of unpleasant vaginal smells can include, for example, STIs or a tampon left inside unknowingly. If you notice any significant changes in odour, speak to your GP. Why have I got an itch down below? Viagra may protect against heart disease and other cardiovascular events, new data suggests April 3, 2023 Sensitivity to any of the ingredients in Vagisan can lead to inflammation of the soft folds of skin on the outside of the female genitalia. The irritation is caused by allergic reaction. The skin of the vulva is especially susceptible to irritation due to its moistness and warmth. You are still able to use Vagisanduring pregnancy however the applicator should not be use to apply cream internally. To insert the cream use a clean finger and around 2cm worth of product. The cream must not be used immediately after childbirth.

Mr Justice Adam Johnson concluded that the average consumer would not have been accustomed to seeing Vagi as a signposting device in the female intimate health sector in 2013, in the same way as Opti, Pedi or Nico are in their respective sectors. The defendants' own trade witness could only identify one other product with the same prefix (Vagifem) being sold in the UK at that time, but this was a prescription only product. Unlike other products for vaginal dryness, Dr. Wolff’s Vagisan Moisturizing Cream is a real cream and not a gel (aqueous preparations). Its dual effect provides moisture AND soothing lipids (fats) to the skin in the vaginal and external genital area. He explained that seeking to invalidate a later mark (as Combe did at the EU Intellectual Property Office) is "objecting to the very existence of the mark on which the section 48 defence is based" as, if successful and the later mark is declared void, "then there never will have been any later mark at all for any other person to have made use of". Rebranding rejected Gradually, the drop in oestrogen levels during menopause will make the vaginal lining less plump and moist,” explains Dr Morton. This thinning and drying of the vaginal walls can sometimes cause irritation, itchiness and burning, and can also make sex uncomfortable, or even painful. “To alleviate discomfort, some women will need oestrogen treatment in the form of pessaries or cream, while other women may prefer a product like Dr. Wolff's Vagisan Moisturising Cream, which is hormone-free,” Dr Morton adds. They absolutely do!” says Dr Morton. “I advise women to exercise their pelvic floor every time they’re standing still for a while: brushing their teeth; in the queue at the Post Office. It’s better to prevent urine leakage than try to cure it.”

Any online pharmacy should be registered with the General Pharmaceutical Council and any online doctor service should registered with the Care Quality Commission and General Medical Council.

In light of the nature of the products, together with considerable evidence of actual consumer confusion between the competing signs, the High Court concluded that there was a risk of confusion between VAGISIL and VAGISAN, and also with DR WOLFF's VAGISAN. Court of Appeal DecisionMoreover, healthcare brand owners should be wary when seeking to add "Dr" followed by a name as a signifier of trade origin. Here, the judge found that the addition of "Dr" was likely to be understood as an indicator of authenticity and likely effectiveness of the product rather than its commercial origin. Overall, the judge held that there was a likelihood of confusion, owing to: (i) the low attentiveness of the average consumer and (ii) the marks being "very, very similar". The judge also separately found that there was evidence of actual confusion.