Act of Oblivion: The Sunday Times Bestseller

Product Information

Robert Harris's latest offering is a gripping piece of historical fiction, a blend of fact and fiction that imagines the turbulent period of history after the Restoration. It is 1660 and the monarchy in the form of Charles II has been returned to power, Colonel Edward Whalley and his son-in-law, Colonel William Goffe are wanted for the execution of King Charles I, a consequence of the English Civil War, followed by the rule of Oliver Cromwell. They board a ship to cross the Atlantic to America and the New England colonies, where many Puritans reside, sympathetic to their plight, landing in Boston. They are on the run, with the royalists demanding a savage retribution. Under the provisions of the Act of Oblivion, 59 men who signed Charles I's death warrant have been found guilty in absentia of regicide and high treason. The Indemnity and Oblivion Act fulfilled the suggestion given in the Declaration of Breda that reprisals against the establishment which had developed during the English Interregnum would be restricted to those who had officiated in the regicide of King Charles I. I почти никак не бяха засегнати, а малкото препратки бяха с размера и с вълнуващия стил на бележка под линия. The 1660 Act worked off a prior template. The Act of Oblivion of 1563, enacted by the Scottish Parliament, mandated that “all deede . . . contrair the Lawes of this Realme . . . and the memorie thereof . . . be expired, buryed and extinct for ever: even as the same had never bene maid . . . .” 5 Open this footnote Close this footnote 5 Id. at 181 (quoting “The Act of Oblivioun,” in 2 The Acts of the Parliaments of Scotland 535-36 (Thomas Thomson & Cosmo Innes eds., 1563)). … Open this footnote Close The 1660 Act followed suit in fashioning a state-mandated exercise in collective amnesia. It barred the populace from making malicious allegations “against any other person or persons, any Name or Names, or other Words of Reproach, any way tending to revive the Memory of the late Differences.” 6 Open this footnote Close this footnote 6 Id. at 243 (quoting An Act of Free and General Pardon, Indemnity and Oblivion, 12 Car. II c. 11 (1660)). … Open this footnote Close And it had teeth—Meyler reports that anyone who violated it was “forced to pay the aggrieved individual a fairly significant fine.” 7 Open this footnote Close this footnote 7 Id. … Open this footnote Close The year is 1660. The Act of Oblivion has been passed. Charles II has been restored as King of England after a decade of puritan rule by Oliver Cromwell. In the midst of this political upheaval, the question of what to do with the 51 men who signed the death warrant of Charles I remains unanswered. Until the Act of Oblivion.

An Irish act by the same name "An Act of Free and General Pardon, Indemnity, and Oblivion [for Ireland]" was sent to the Duke of Ormonde on 16 August 1664 by Sir Paul Davys, the Irish Secretary of State. [23] In popular culture [ edit ] Act Of Oblivion offers a resonant history of both England and America as they struggle to forge a myth of nationhood out of opposing ideologies * Daily Mail *XXIV. The penalty upon any person that shall within three years use any words of reproach or disgrace, tending to revive the memory of the late differences. An absolutely stunning historical novel and a ripping crime thriller at the same time. I've been recommending it far and wide and buying it for people for Christmas! * Dead Good * IX. The penalty of any officer, &c. that shall go about to disquiet or trouble any person pardoned by this act. The antagonist of Harris’s novel is a man by the name of Richard Nayler. The only fictional character among an otherwise historically accurate cast, Nayler is a royalist, a member of the Privy Council, loyal to the king, Charles II, and obsessively fixated on bringing the remaining regicides to justice. More than a decade after the execution of the king at the hands of Cromwell, Nayler has yet to lose his thirst for vengeance: In London, Richard Nayler, secretary of the regicide committee of the Privy Council, is charged with bringing the traitors to justice and he will stop at nothing to find them. A substantial bounty hangs over their heads for their capture—dead or alive. . . .

The book excels in its stunning recreation of the landscape of America... Harris proves himself to be masterful at this and it gives the book a vibrant memorability * New Statesman * He took a while to reply. By the time he spoke the men had gone inside. He said quietly, 'They killed the King.' May 1660, Pardon and Oblivion, British History On-line House of Commons Journal Volume 8 (www.british-history.ac.uk) XXXII. Persons that have had directions or instructions for his Majesty, and have betrayed their trust, or his councils excepted.

BookBrowse Review

The Act of Oblivion may seem no more than a curiosity today. Congress has never passed such an Act, nor is it likely to do so. Yet as Meyler has shown in a piece titled Pardon, but Don’t Forget 26 Open this footnote Close this footnote 26 Meyler, supra note 23. … Open this footnote Close in the Take Care blog, the Anglo-American rejection of the Acts of Oblivion may itself illuminate contemporary legal life. Charles II, 1660: An Act of Free and Generall Pardon Indemnity and Oblivion, Statutes of the Realm: volume 5: 1628–80 (1819), pp.226–34. Nayler is searching for them. A fictional character, created by Harris, he appears a less sympathetic person than Ned and Will, but reveals the other face of this civil war which had split the nation; a royalist supporter who had dipped his handkerchief in the king's blood and who always carried it with him. The stuff about the new settlements in America was the most interesting part for me, although Harris dragged it out for far too long. He assumes people will know the basic history of Cromwell and the Restoration, and puts no political element into the plot. I felt that more concentration on the Restoration and less on these two runaways would have given scope for more interest. There’s only so much you can say about two men hiding in a barn, or a cellar, or an attic, or even the wilderness. My knowledge of 17th century English history doesn't go much beyond the basics. Before reading this book I was unaware of the scope of the hunt for the "regicides", the men who were responsible for the beheading of Charles I as part of Cromwell's rise to power. Edward Whalley and his son-in-law William Goffe, officers in Cromwell's army, escaped from England to America, thus avoiding the ominous fate that awaited those who were captured in England or on the continent. Act of Oblivion: A Novel is a fictionalization of their lives, and those around them, after they landed in Boston.

Harris is a master of historical fiction, a compelling author who brings to life the recent and ancient past -- Justin Warshaw * TLS * Act of Oblivion is a fine novel about a divided nation, about invisible wounds that heal slower than visible ones . . . it feels like an important book for our particular historical moment, one that shows the power of forgiveness and the intolerable burden of long-held grudges * Observer * The lands of the Crown and the established Church were automatically restored, but lands of Royalists and other dissenters confiscated and sold during the Civil War and interregnum were left for private negotiation or litigation, meaning that the government would not help the Loyalists in regaining their property. Disappointed Royalists commented that the Act meant "indemnity for [Charles'] enemies and oblivion for his friends". [3] Historians, on the other hand, have generally praised the King and Clarendon for the generosity and clemency of the Act, in an age not normally noted for mercy. [4] Twenty years later, during the Popish Plot, Charles tried unsuccessfully to stand against the relentless demand for the execution of Catholic priests, and reminded the public sharply of how many of them had previously benefited from his reluctance to shed blood. [5] Issued just weeks after Meyler’s post, Judge Bolton’s decision adheres to this line of reasoning. 42 Open this footnote Close this footnote 42 See United States v. Arpaio, No. CR-16-01012-001-PHX-SRB, 2017 WL 4839072 (D. Ariz. Oct. 19, 2017). … Open this footnote Close It states: “The power to pardon is an executive prerogative of mercy, not of judicial record-keeping.” 43 Open this footnote Close this footnote 43 Id. at *2 (quoting United States v. Noonan, 906 F.2d 952, 955 (3d Cir. 1990)). … Open this footnote Close To grant the defendant’s request to vacate all rulings in the case, it continues, “would run afoul of this important distinction.” 44 Open this footnote Close this footnote 44 Id. … Open this footnote Close The court concludes: “The pardon undoubtedly spared Defendant from any punishment that might otherwise have been imposed. It did not, however, ‘revise the historical facts’ of this case.” 45 Open this footnote Close this footnote 45 Id. (quoting 67A C.J.S. Pardon & Parole § 33 (2019)). … Open this footnote Close

Media Reviews

Harris pays much attention to historical details throughout the novel. Dates, names, and locations are historically accurate to the true story of Whalley and Goffe story, with the above mentioned exception of the antagonist, Richard Nayler. July 1660 Pardon and Oblivion, That the Title of this Bill be, "An Act of free and general Pardon, Indemnity, and Oblivion" Passed and was sent to the House of Lords. [15] The act is often viewed from the perspective of those who were not pardoned and thus condemned to death. However, the debate in Parliament continued almost every day for over two months and names were added and taken off the list of those who were not to be pardoned. Initially, there were only seven on the list: [6] [7] Thomas Harrison, William Say, John Jones Maesygarnedd, Thomas Scot, John Lisle, Cornelius Holland, and John Barkstead. On 7 June, the Commons, mindful of the Declaration of Breda, stated they as the Commons could add to the list others who would not be covered by the general pardon. They immediately added John Cooke, Andrew Broughton, Edward Dendy, and the "Two Persons who were upon the Scaffold in a Disguise" (i.e. the executioners). [8] On 8 June, the Commons voted "That the Number of Twenty, and no more, (other than those that are already excepted, or sat as Judges upon the late King's Majesty) shall be excepted out of the Act of general Pardon and Oblivion, for and in respect only of such Pains, Penalties, and Forfeitures, (not extending to Life) as shall be thought fit to be inflicted on them by another Act, intended to be hereafter passed for that purpose". [9]